I'm not happy with how I played last night, I didn't make some really super-easy folds and it cost me 100bb's more than once. But, I feel good today and will be ready to grind out a long session after I eat.
I'm going to break my grind up into shorter sessions. Probably play 1k hands at first, 4-8 tabling, then evaluate my state of mind. If I feel I'm getting lazy/tired, I'll take a break. Then start up again for a quick 500 hand session and evaluate. Repeat.
If after those 1k hands I'm feeling great, I'm going to add another table or two and evaluate every 500 hands.
Totals since last post:
Hands: 5513
Profit: +90.42$
Tourneys/Sngs: 79
Profit:-52.68$
Bonuses: +300$ 25kFPP bonus. +11$ 280 fpp sat
Total profit since last post: +348.74$
I chose to purchase the 300$ bonus for a number of reasons. Basically the value of having a mental security of my bankroll was worth the loss of .001$ per fpp.
Anyways, in tournaments, I played about 12 or so games HU at the 10$ level. This probably skewed my tourney results as I went semi deep in a 5$ rebuy. But, I was playing an enormous fish. He played 90% of hands from both positions and always limped. He raised his top like 5% of hands.
So easily exploitable its not even funny. He also never folded to cbets (around 20-30%). To exploit him I just cbet really really dry boards, but the majority of my Cbets where for value. I have to think though, is it profitable to raise 40% of hands against guys like these on the button IP? I think I would rather limp like the bottom half of my range just trying to hit, and raise the top half of my range.
Well to cut it short, he got 8 buy-ins off of me in 8 games... 7 of which were coolers, like not "i hit the top of his range" but "damn my AA got cracked all-in preflop." LOL and 1 buyin was a so-so decision. I'd like to learn if what I stated above is the best strategy, about limping on the button against these guys. Thanks.
Pce.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment